AHH CLOVERFIELD! Bobert Runs Screaming For The DVD!
The Official Studio Line:
Five young New Yorkers throw their friend a going-away party the night that a monster the size of a skyscraper descends upon the city. Told from the point of view of their video camera, the film is a document of their attempt to survive the most surreal, horrifying event of their lives.
****BEWARE OF SPOILERS AHEAD!****
When I initially read about the genesis of this film in an article published before it’s theatrical release, I was a bit mystified. The article revealed that after a trip to a Toy store in Japan with his son, producer J.J. Abrams (Co-creator of shows like FELICITY, ALIAS, and LOST) was fascinated with the connection the Japanese still felt with the Godzilla creature and mythos that was spawned over 70 years ago. He wondered why in America we hadn’t developed a similiar rapport. He later decided that he would create an iconic Monster that could become as indelibly attached to America’s Popular Culture as Godzilla is to Japan’s. After reading this, all I could think was “We already have one of those, he’s called King Kong.” I guess the relatively miniscule havok wrought by the giant gorilla wasn’t good enough for Mr. Abrams. And so glimpses of CLOVERFIELD were unleashed into the world in the Summer of 2007 (although at the time, it lacked the title it has now. We were merely given the effectively cryptic “01-18-08″), and the hype machine began rolling at a frighteningly high speed. So did writer Drew Goddard and director Matt Reeves succeed in making Abrams’ ambitious dreams a reality? Uh, no. Did anyone honestly think that CLOVERFIELD could ever have matched up to the ridiculously high and feverish expectations the preceding Teaser and Viral Marketing generated? I would hope not.
But despite it’s failure to become America’s Next Top Monster, CLOVERFIELD is a fun ride of a flick. This is Bigness on a budget and Director Matt Reeves pulls it off expertly. The destruction of Manhattan, Brooklyn Bridge, and The Statue of Liberty is on-par with anything from the $200+ Million BankBusters we’ve seen in the last few Summers. What the filmmakers realized is that its not about quantity, its about quality. They save their big moments, so when we get’em its memoriable and impactful. The one-shot visual style (sorta like the last memerizing sequences in CHILDREN OF MEN) makes the already compelling events unfold with all the more intensity. You’re there in the midst of chaos; unescapably pulled into it like the rest of the helpless individuals caught in a stampede of humanity. Ever since seeing 28 DAYS LATER’s use of digital photography, I knew that this new method of filming was going to open up the vast possibilities of a more immersive and engaging movie experience, and CLOVERFIELD’s YouTube approach pushes these possibilities into a whole new stratosphere. It also grounds the film in a reality rarely afforded these types of genre outtings (except for the preposterous moment where our hapless cameraman is dispatched by the giant beast, somehow sneaking behind him unnoticed long enough to get the poor fool into his gapping maw).
The film’s opening 15 minutes can be a chore for some to get through admittingly. Watching a bunch of seemingly rich yuppie 20-somethings partying, telling bad jokes, and experiencing moments of romantic awkwardness is not on the top of any Monster Movie Lover’s list. But I understand the need for it. You need to establish your protagonists and their motivations in order to have a fully enjoyable movie experience. I’d equate it to the exciting moments of ascension on a rollercoaster right before the big drop, minus the “exciting” part. But once things get going, the films moves at a break-neck speed. Upon seeing it for the first time in a theater, the atmosphere and tone was something akin to seeing live Breaking News. It was that convincing. Once it was over though, I had a sinking feeling that subsequent viewings would result in the “Blair Witch” syndrome. Seeing the film for the first time with no expectations gives an harrowing experience, but the second time around would only be met with boredom and reflective moments of “Did I really like this the first time out?”. Luckily CLOVERFIELD’s well-constructed narrative and plot save it from such a fate, making it a worthwhile repeat viewer. Plus, the fact that many of the film’s “money shots” fly by so quickly means that you don’t mind sitting through it again in hopes of getting a better look. The welcome luxury of DVD also allows for the catching of smaller details that may have been missed (like the unwittingly recorded object that seems to fall out of the sky and into the Atlantic Ocean during the final flashback at Coney Island), or the opportunity to fully appreciate composer Micheal Giacchino’s awesome Cloverfield Overture (which is pleasantly reminiscent of the soaring ROBOCOP 2 overture where a chorus is chanting “Robocop” ad nauseum).

Now what about the much-talked about Monster? The Creature itself is rather odd. They weren’t kidding when the filmmakers laid claim that we were going to see something we had never seen before. But it hardly possessed an iconic design that strikes a timeless chord with audiences. It ain’t no Godzilla (and I’m talking about the Japanese incarnation, not that giant iguana Devlin and Emmerich infamously dropped on American audiences in 1998), but it’s weird enough to leave an impression. I suppose the real source of dissappointment and frustration for most viewers anticipating the flick was the lack of any explanation about the creature’s origins. All we have is this video document from a group of clueless youngsters that can hardly hold a camera stable long enough to get a decent look at the monstrosity. After all the thoeries, clues, and hints at a deeper mythos awaiting them, the film’s complete lack thereof may have been percieved as a fairly resonate slight. However, considering the context of the film (found footage from the perspective of unsuspecting city residence), there could be no way to shoehorn in any explanations without it sounding like forced exposition. Maybe if this so-called video file had been interspersed with other video logs of government scientists hypothesizing or experimenting on the remains of the creature, these dissapointed folks may have felt more justified in their rabid hunt for clues months prior to the film’s release.
Lets start our review of the DVD extras with Director Matt Reeves’ feature commentary, which is a good one and well worth a listen. He goes over everything from the film’s origins, the process of making a Blockbuster Monster Movie on a quarter-sized budget, to even mentioning the frenzy generated by the Teaser (including the whole “It’s a Lion/It’s Alive!” debacle) and his further fueling of it with the eerie voiceover played at the end of the film credits.Then we have three featurettes focusing on the making of the film, it’s digital effects, and the logic behind the design for the creature. I wish the third featurette had been a little more in-depth regarding the monster design because what we get is a succinct but short look at designer Neville Page’s motivations and ideas. Also, the complete omission of any thoughts from the filmmakers regarding the viral marketing campaign and the clues found therein is frustrating even to someone like myself that didn’t really buy into all the hype. Good, not great. And not enough to satiate my hunger for info on the project. From there we get the obligatory gag reel and several deservedly deleted scenes. The alternate endings seemed to have been the biggest topic of discussion before the DVD release, and will likely leave fans once again disappointed. All we get is a different closing flashback and the split-second inclusion of a fuzzy face supposedly belonging to a member of the recovery team that discovers the video camera. Then there’s previews of INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL and J.J. Abrams’ STAR TREK prequel. Oh, and there’s some VERY interesting Easter Eggs for those of you that have not yet been spurned enough to give up on the CLOVERFIELD mythos. I took the time to check them out and their inclusion eased my aforemented frustration with the unacknowledgment of the viral marketing by the filmmakers. Sometimes you just can’t help but get caught up in an intricately weaved mystery, so have fun with those.
As it stands, CLOVERFIELD is a fun and exciting Monster movie that amalgamates the BLAIR WITCH PROJECT style with the GODZILLA premise. Unfortunately not as good as THE HOST (South Korea’s first foray into the Monster Movie genre, released here last year), but definitely nowhere near the stinker 1998′s GODZILLA turned out to be. Plus the DVD has some worthy things to offer, especially the hidden Easter Eggs. I’d definitely recommend it. Until next time, keep those discs spinning…
Bobert’s Rating: ![]()
![]()
- RECOMMENDED!
Bobert’s Alternative Picks:

The Official Studio Line:





The problem cannot be easily solved, and is quite frustrating. Even though the system thinks it is overheating, this is not the case. You could have your xbox near freezing (believe me I tried), but this does not repair the damage already done. You may get lucky and have the system start up again, but beware. Later model 360’s have cured this problem by using better materials, and an upgraded cooling system, but many of the early model 360’s may suffer from this problem. This leads us to the question “what do I do?”. In a clear “OOPS!” moment, Microsoft did extend their warranty to 2 years to help customers suffering from these Xbox STDs (Seriously Terrible Defects). This means you can contact them about your problem, and they will send a box and a packing label to you. You send them back your Xbox, and after they determine it cannot be fixed, they will send you a refurbished one in its place.